Approval history
Attach the accepted product definition and subsequent approvals to the job so the current instruction can be checked.
MONTRÉAL / MANUFACTURING
Factory automation in Montréal.
Connect business information with floor reality, then choose the work worth automating against a clear operating baseline.
Discuss your operation
THE OPERATION BEHIND THE EQUIPMENT
Keep a specialized component's approval history attached to the job.
Montréal's aerospace ecosystem includes design, component production and support activity. In such a manufacturing context, a released job needs more than a due date. We trace the approved definition, supplier evidence and inspection decisions through the software and conversations that currently hold them.
For example, a component can be physically complete while a required inspection record remains with another team. Making that dependency visible may matter more than shortening the machining cycle.
DECISIONS WORTH CONNECTING
Inspection records
Link required checks, results and outstanding evidence to the component awaiting release.
Specialized routing
Identify which external processes and approval steps apply to the specific job rather than assuming every component follows the standard route.
Understand the work before choosing what to automate.
Observe the business and the floor
Start with orders, purchasing, planning and existing software. Compare those records with operators, maintenance and the conditions on the floor.
Connect a useful part of the operation
Make the relevant sources, owners, changes and exceptions visible. Build a usable operating model, with its uncertainties, rather than attempt to capture everything.
Prioritize a defensible intervention
Compare coordination time, throughput constraints, quality and cost against a baseline. A workflow connection may be more useful than new machinery.
Automate selectively and keep revising
Where justified, test a bounded physical task with representative variation. Agree on controls, recovery, training and continuing ownership.
More time for the decisions that need you.
Saving coordination time and protecting profitability require an operating baseline. We help identify what can change and how to judge whether it helps you stay competitive.
Less information chasing
Give the responsible person the context for a decision instead of another disconnected status.
Clearer investment choices
Compare total scope, integration, maintenance and ongoing work before choosing equipment.
Work people can operate
Keep exceptions, human authority and recovery visible as products and suppliers change.
Where does coordination consume your team’s time?
Tell us the location, production context, recurring exceptions and systems involved. We will discuss fit and a sensible next step. What makes a completed component ready for release in your operation?
Before choosing an automation project.
What is the difference between a complete job and a releasable component?
Physical work can be complete while inspection evidence, documentation or an approval remains outstanding. Discovery should establish those distinctions in your own operation, identify the responsible people and make the outstanding condition visible. Software status alone should not be treated as a substitute for the required release decision.
Do we need to replace all our existing equipment?
No. Discovery starts with the systems and equipment you already use. A useful first change may connect information or clarify a handover. New equipment and physical pilots follow a justified use case.
Can you confirm savings or local site work now?
Neither is assumed. We need to understand your baseline, access and requirements. We agree on remote and on-site work, responsibilities, costs and support for the specific project.