Approved work instructions
Check how a released specification becomes an instruction at the workstation, including which older copies remain in circulation.
Connect business information with floor reality, then choose the work worth automating against a clear operating baseline.
Discuss your operation
Quebec's aerospace and agri-food activity puts very different demands on production records. In a component business, the accepted revision matters; in a food operation, lot identity and release conditions matter. Discovery should establish what each record means, who approves it and whether the floor receives the same instruction as the office.
For example, a supplier substitution can affect both an approved part list and a work instruction. Connecting only the purchasing record leaves production to discover the difference.
Check how a released specification becomes an instruction at the workstation, including which older copies remain in circulation.
Follow material and product identity through receipt, production and inspection so a release decision refers to the right lot.
Identify which teams need French or English instructions, who maintains each version and how both receive an approved change.
Start with orders, purchasing, planning and existing software. Compare those records with operators, maintenance and the conditions on the floor.
Make the relevant sources, owners, changes and exceptions visible. Build a usable operating model, with its uncertainties, rather than attempt to capture everything.
Compare coordination time, throughput constraints, quality and cost against a baseline. A workflow connection may be more useful than new machinery.
Where justified, test a bounded physical task with representative variation. Agree on controls, recovery, training and continuing ownership.
Saving coordination time and protecting profitability require an operating baseline. We help identify what can change and how to judge whether it helps you stay competitive.
Give the responsible person the context for a decision instead of another disconnected status.
Compare total scope, integration, maintenance and ongoing work before choosing equipment.
Keep exceptions, human authority and recovery visible as products and suppliers change.
Tell us the location, production context, recurring exceptions and systems involved. We will discuss fit and a sensible next step. Where do approved changes stop reaching the people doing the work?
Share the working languages, source systems and instructions involved. The scope should define which records need translation, who approves technical terminology and how each version stays current. Translation alone does not resolve conflicting instructions or unclear release authority.
No. Discovery starts with the systems and equipment you already use. A useful first change may connect information or clarify a handover. New equipment and physical pilots follow a justified use case.
Neither is assumed. We need to understand your baseline, access and requirements. We agree on remote and on-site work, responsibilities, costs and support for the specific project.